Legal Opinion

Haskell v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 14, 1981No. Claim No. 62071PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—■ Appeals from orders of the Court of Claims, filed February 26, 1980, which granted the State’s motions to dismiss the claims. In their original form, these claims demanded compensation for claimants’ loss of dairy cows, required to be destroyed due to the introduction of bovine brucellosis (Bang’s disease) into their herds. The State’s liability for the loss was alleged to be based on the general responsibility of the Commissioner of Agriculture and Markets, pursuant to section 72 of the Agriculture and Markets Law, to properly control that disease in regard to the claimants’ herds and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Evers v. WesterbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
  2. Evers v. WesterbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Southworth v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Dutton v. City of OleanNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Plateis v. FlaxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Catania v. LippmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Guggenheim v. GuggenheimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Suffolk County Water Authority v. J.D. Posillico, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Miller v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  5. Young v. AbdellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API