Legal Opinion

Carlton S. Scott v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 22, 1964No. 17565PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

It has been our policy to see that, in the public interest, any attack made upon a criminal conviction or sentence is not left open but is terminated and cleared from the records of the District Court and this Court.

To accomplish that end in the present situation, the appeal pending from the District Court’s allowing of notice of appeal to be filed to its order denying modification or correction of appellant’s sentence will be permitted to be docketed without payment of fee, but leave to proceed further in forma pauperis will be denied, and the appeal will be dismissed as frivolous.

In thus…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Byers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Stapf v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
  2. United States v. James Delmar DeatonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
  3. John Robert Sawyer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
  4. Walter Olie Noorlander v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
  5. Allen v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API