Legal Opinion

Finnell v. Cox

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 11, 1860PublishedCited by 15 opinions

CASE 8 — PETITION ORDINARY — APPEAL FROM FRANKLIN CIRCUIT COURT. cited Civil Code, sec. 670 ; Smith’s Leading Cases, Law Library, vol. 4A,page 87; 16 Johns., 72; 1 Hill, 131; 9 Serg. and Rawle, 229 ; 9 Watts, 144; 11 Peters, 95; 7 Cranch, 200; 5 Mon., 268; 7 B. Mon., 226; 24 Ala., 378; 2 Hill, 3 ; 6 Peters, 59. cited 18 B. Mon., 128; 21 Pick.-, 327; 9 Mass. Rep., 55.

1Opinion of the Court

JjJDjjE DUVALL

delivered.the opinion or the court:

Finnell, as commissioper pf the Kentucky Trust Company Bank, brought this action against T. M. Cox as the acceptor of a bill of exchange for $2,500, drawn by R. Cox, in favor of Raper, Cox & Co., alleging that after the acceptance, and before the maturity of the bill, it was sold and indorsed by the payees, Raper, Cox & Co., to the bank.

The defendant, in his answer, 'alleges that he accepted the bill for the accommodation of the payees, who, at the time, were indebted to the Lafayette Bank of Cincinnati, and the ' object was to enable the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Riddle v. MossSupreme Court of the United States · 1812

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Woodward v. SartwellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  2. Lehnhardt v. JenningsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Commonwealth v. City of RoxburyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1857
  4. Hyman v. LandryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  5. McGrath v. Worcester County National BankMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API