Legal Opinion
South Dakota v. Opperman
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided July 6, 1976No. 75-76PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court 1
428 U.S. 364 (1976)
SOUTH DAKOTA
v.
OPPERMAN.
No. 75-76.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued March 29, 1976.
Decided July 6, 1976.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH DAKOTA.
William J. Janklow, Attorney General of South Dakota, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Earl R. Mettler, Assistant Attorney General.
Robert C. Ulrich, by appointment of the Court, 423 U. S. 1012, argued the cause for respondent pro hac vice. With him on the brief were Lee M. McCahren and John F. Hagemann.[*]
2Opinion of the Court · BurgerChief Justice Burger
We review the judgment of the Supreme Court of South Dakota, holding that local police…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.
3Cases cited71 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- Com. v. Heidelberg, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021