Felten v. Mellott
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Fine, J.,
The sole question in this workmen’s compensation case is whether there is substantial and competent evidence sufficient to support the findings of the compensation authorities that deceased, Ross Felten, was an employe of the defendant and not an independent contractor. The referee and the board both concluded that deceased was an employe and an award of compensation was made in favor of Hazel Felten, deceased’s widow. The court below affirmed the findings of the board and entered judgment on the award. The employer and his insurance carrier now appeal complaining that the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- McColligan v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Joseph v. United Workers Assn.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Kelley v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Robson v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Gailey v. State Workmen's Insurance FundSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Potash v. BonaccursoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Bogan v. Smoothway Construction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Ramondo v. RamondoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Gadd v. BARONESuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Eggelton v. LEETESuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.