Alabama Chemical Co. v. International Agricultural Corp.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BOULD1N, J.
The suit is upon a promissory note given for certain shipments of Florida land pebble phosphate rock for use in the manufacture of commercial fertilizer. The theory of the defense is that the product shipped was defective in quality for lack of content of bone phosphate of lime stipulated in the written contract of sale, for which defendant claims an abatement of the price equal to the unpaid balance of the note sued upon.
The pleadings raising the issues are voluminous, but our labors are reduced by a thoughtful concession on both sides that the controlling questions turn upori the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Martinsburg & Potomac Railroad v. MarchSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Shriner v. CraftSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Brooke v. Laurens Milling Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
- Abercrombie & Williams v. VandiverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
- Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. IsbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Phillips v. Sipsey Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Fox v. WebbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
- BOARD OF WATER & SEWER COM'RS v. Bill Harbert Const. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Bartlett & Company, Grain v. The Merchants Company, the Merchants Company v. Bartlett& Company, GrainCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Regional Agricultural Credit Corp. v. HendleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.