HURST BY HURST v. Dougherty
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRANKS, Judge.
In this medical malpractice action the plaintiff, whose finger was amputated during her delivery by caesarean section, appeals from an adverse jury verdict and assigns as error a portion of the trial court’s instructions to the jury and also contends there is no material evidence to support the verdict.
Plaintiff was delivered by caesarean section, performed on August 6, 1985. The defendant physician amputated part of the infant plaintiff’s little finger while extracting her from the womb.
Plaintiff’s mother entered the hospital on the day before delivery with severe bouts…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cardwell v. BechtolTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
- In Re Estate of ElamTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
- Truan v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1979
- Robert I. Ward and Ruth Ward, Cross-Appellees v. United States of America, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Johnson v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- White v. Vanderbilt UniversityCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
- Godbee v. DimickCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
- Yates v. University of West Virginia Board of TrusteesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
- Hampton v. NiehausSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Roddy v. Volunteer Medical Clinic, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.