Legal Opinion

Fretz v. Roth

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 18, 1906PublishedCited by 16 opinions

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Garrison, whose opinion is reported in 68 N. J. Eq. 516.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Vredenbuegh, J.

The decree appealed from declares void two warranty deeds of conveyance dated April 15th, 1891, by means of which was effected the transmission of title from the-complainant, through an intermediary, to his late wife, Louisa, of a house and lot of land in the city of Paterson, N. -J. The same decree also adjudges that the defendant Carl Roth shall, within ten days, *765convey to complainant the property, and makes perpetual an injunction which restrained Roth from proceeding with an ejectment suit against the complainant. By virtue of these…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re FulperNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1926
  2. Peardon v. PeardonNevada Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Blake v. BrennanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1948
  4. Casternovia v. CasternoviaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
  5. Campana v. AngeliniNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API