Legal Opinion
State v. Baker
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided January 30, 2007No. 23835-1-IIIPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
151 P.3d 237 (2007)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Shappa Jay BAKER, Appellant.
No. 23835-1-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3.
January 30, 2007.
Ronnie M. Rae, Attorney at Law, Spokane, WA, Stormy N. Howell, Attorney at Law, Port Angeles, WA, for Appellant.
Kevin Michael Korsmo, Attorney at Law, Spokane, WA, for Respondent.
SWEENEY, C.J.
¶ 1 Whether factual findings are sufficient to support the essential elements of a crime is a question of law. Whether factual inferences from historical facts are supported by the record is also a question of law. Intent is an essential element of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. BencivengaWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Clark v. BainesWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. BencivengaWashington Supreme Court · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State of Arizona v. Miguel Francisco InzunzaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Kathryn Taylor v. Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- Kathryn Taylor v. Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- State Of Washington v. Aurora Lillian AndersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
- State Of Washington v. Kevin Albert RiveraCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.