Legal Opinion

Tallman v. Moore

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 18, 1929No. Appeal 44Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

This appeal is from judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense in assumpsit. The suit is on a bond given by defendants to plaintiffs. They sue for judgment for the penal sum of the bond, $12,000, alleging certain breaches of condition with averments of damage claimed for each breach alleged. The Act of June 14, 1836, P. L. 638, section 1, (in substance re-enacting 8 and 9 Wm. III, c. 11, Sec. 8; 4 Troubat & Haly’s Practice, 6th Ed. p. 2728) provides for such suit: Reynolds v. Lowry, 6 Pa. 465, 468; Duffy v. Lytle, 5 W. 120; New Holland Turnpike Co. v. Lancaster…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. New Holland Turnpike Co. v. Lancaster CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1872
  2. Anderson's Administrators v. WashabaughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1862
  3. Bernhardt v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  4. Randall Building & Loan Ass'n v. Manayunk Realty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  5. Keating v. PeddrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API