Legal Opinion · Dissent

Carson v. Secretary of Health & Human Services

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided August 28, 2013No. 2010-5089Published

1DissentNewman, Circuit Judge

The court today holds that the statute of limitations starts to run before the fact or even the likelihood of vaccine-related injury is recognizable by medical professionals. Thus the court holds that behavior that the medical community did not associate with a vaccine-related injury and “may even be normal” can qualify as a “first symptom” of vaccine-related injury for purposes of commencement of the three-year limitations period of the Vaccine Act. The result is that in the case of Kit Carson the limitations period ended less than a year after the evolving combination of symptoms was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sebelius v. CloerSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. Cedillo v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  3. Cloer v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  4. Michael and Melissa Markovich, Parents of Ashlyn M. Markovich v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  5. Setnes ex rel. Setnes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API