St. John Medical Center v. Department of Social & Health Services
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSeinfeld, J.
— This fee dispute between St. John Medical Center, a medical service provider, and the State Depart*55ment of Social and Health Services (DSHS) raises a question of contract interpretation. We conclude that the fee-for-service agreement at issue was a unilateral contract and that statutes, rules, and regulations adopted after the parties entered into the agreement but before St. John performed modified the agreement. Consequently, it did not cover the services St. John provided to managed care patients at the request of a managed care organization. Thus, we reverse the trial court’s grant of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- In Re Pacor, Inc. v. John Higgins, Jr. And Louise HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- A.H. Robins Co. v. PiccininCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- Burnside v. Simpson Paper Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
- Orwick v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Northwest Independent Forest Manufacturers v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Quadrant Corp. v. American States Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
- Oltman v. Holland America Line USA, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
- Oltman v. Holland America Line USA, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
- Pacific Marine Insurance v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- VEHICLE/VESSEL LLC, DRA v. Whitman CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.