Legal Opinion

Archer v. Utah State Land Board

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1964No. 9990PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, District Judge..

This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal by a district court in a civil action. The amended, complaint was dismissed because (the 'court held) that tribunal did not possess jurisdiction and said complaint did not state a claim upon which relief could be granted. For the reasons hereinafter set out we determine that said district court did have jurisdiction and the amended complaint does allege facts which, if established, would entitle plaintiff to certain relief.

We turn first, to the statute involved. Sec. 6S-1-88, U.C.A., insofar as applicable here, provides as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wilkinson v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1913
  2. McKnight v. State Land BoardUtah Supreme Court · 1963
  3. James W. Haley v. Fred A. Seaton, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
  4. Woodcock v. Board of EducationUtah Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Miles v. WellsUtah Supreme Court · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In re J. P.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
  2. STATE, DEPT. OF SOCIAL SERVICES v. HiggsUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Terracor v. Utah Board of State Lands & ForestryUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Grant v. Utah State Land BoardUtah Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Stephens v. HendersonUtah Supreme Court · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API