Legal Opinion

Miller v. Kelley

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 21, 1901No. 154PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Hearing on an appeal from a decision of tbe Commissioner of Patents in an interference case. Tbe facts are sufficiently stated in tbe opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Morris

This appeal is taken from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents in an interference case, wherein the matter in issue between the parties is defined in nineteen several counts, embracing three classes of improvements in matchmaking machines, as follows:

“ 1. In a match-machine, the combination of a splint-carrier and a splint-evening roll provided with a roughened, splint-engaging surface, substantially as specified.
“ 2. In a match-making machine, the combination of a splint-carrier adapted to receive and carry splints transversely to the carrier, and parallel evening-rolls located upon…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Roensch v. BillnerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API