Legal Opinion

Caruso v. Town of Oyster Bay

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1997Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Sandra J. Feuerstein, J.

The motion by plaintiffs for a preliminary injunction and the cross motion by the defendants for summary judgment dismissing the complaint are determined as hereinafter provided.

The plaintiff, Joseph Caruso, a builder, purchased a certain piece of property known as section 21, block 206, lot 48, located at 4 Central Drive, Glen Head, New York, in February 1996. Prior to purchasing the property Mr. Caruso ascertained that the property was located in a Residence C zone which requires a minimum lot area of 10,000 square feet. Mr. Caruso intended to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Save the Pine Bush, Inc. v. City of AlbanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Cuomo v. Long Island Lighting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Cellular Telephone Co. v. Village of TarrytownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Ferrari v. Town of Penfield Planning BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. Voelckers v. GuelliNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API