Legal Opinion

Shanken v. Lee Wolfman, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 11, 1963No. 14174PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WERLEIN, Justice.

Appellant, James I. Shanken, individually and as a representative and registered shareholder of Lee Wolfman, Inc., which merchandizes ladies’ ready-to-wear from its store on Kirby Drive in Houston under the name of “Wolfman’s,” brought this suit against Lee Wolfman and wife, Margaret Wolfman, Charles Ford and wife, Irene Ford, sometimes referred to collectively as individual appellees, Wolfman’s Inc.— Spring Branch, sometimes referred to as the “Spring Branch store,” and Wolfman’s Inc. This appeal is from a summary judgment granted appellees.

Appellant alleged that he filed…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. WalkerTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Box v. BatesTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Reese v. DavitteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  4. Nelson v. Texas Employment CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  5. Citizens' National Bank v. GrahamTexas Supreme Court · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Childs v. WeisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  2. Scruggs v. George A. Hormel & CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  3. Sawyer v. Bd. of Regents of Claredon Junior CollegeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  4. White v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  5. City of Houston v. Emmanuel United Pentecostal Church, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API