Legal Opinion

Seibert v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 22, 1988No. 53475PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CRIST, Judge.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion without an evidentiary hearing. By that motion movant sought to have his guilty pleas for robbery first degree, assault first degree and stealing a motor vehicle set aside. We affirm.

After a guilty plea, the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel can only be raised in the context of the voluntary and knowing nature of the plea. Green v. State, 708 S.W.2d 295, 297 [3] (Mo.App.1986); Wade v. State, 698 S.W.2d 621, 622 [2] (Mo.App.1985). Movant asserts his plea was involuntary because in refusing to interview two eyewitnesses…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wade v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Green v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Francks v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Alford v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API