Legal Opinion

Pike v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 28, 1983No. 66631PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sognier, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of burglary, aggravated assault, aggravated sodomy and rape. On appeal he contends the trial court erred by allowing appellant’s written admission into evidence, and by forcing appellant, over timely objection, to stand trial wearing prison clothing.

As appellant’s enumeration relating to prison clothing is dispositive of this case, we will address only that issue. In this regard, it was stipulated that appellant’s only civilian clothing was taken from him at the time of his arrest and sent to the crime laboratory. His clothing had not been returned to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Eaddy v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1946
  3. LaRue v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  4. Hayslip v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  5. Sharpe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. PikeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  2. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  3. House v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  4. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  5. Kerr v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API