Legal Opinion

Marriage of Mattson v. Mattson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 2, 2017No. A16-1535PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JESSON, Judge

Mark Mattson asserts that federal law renders unenforceable the district court’s judgment directing him to pay Diana Berberich 40% of his. military disability compensation. In light of the recent United States Supreme Court decision, Howell v. Howell, — U.S. —, 137 S.Ct. 1400, 197 L.Ed.2d 781 (2017), we agree. Federal law preempts state courts from dividing a veteran’s military disability' compensation as marital property, even where, as here, the parties agreed to the division. As a result, we reverse and remahd for entry of judgment reflecting the unenforceability of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gade v. National Solid Wastes Management Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Hisquierdo v. HisquierdoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Mansell v. MansellSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Rose v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Marschner v. MarschnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API