Marriage of Mattson v. Mattson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JESSON, Judge
Mark Mattson asserts that federal law renders unenforceable the district court’s judgment directing him to pay Diana Berberich 40% of his. military disability compensation. In light of the recent United States Supreme Court decision, Howell v. Howell, — U.S. —, 137 S.Ct. 1400, 197 L.Ed.2d 781 (2017), we agree. Federal law preempts state courts from dividing a veteran’s military disability' compensation as marital property, even where, as here, the parties agreed to the division. As a result, we reverse and remahd for entry of judgment reflecting the unenforceability of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Gade v. National Solid Wastes Management Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Hisquierdo v. HisquierdoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Mansell v. MansellSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Rose v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Marschner v. MarschnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2026