Legal Opinion

Cranford v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 22, 1990No. CR 89-148PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steele Hays, Justice.

This appeal is brought from a denial of post-conviction relief under Ark. R. Cr. P. Rule 37. The issue is whether the appellants received ineffective assistance of counsel in connection with their guilty pleas.

In January of 1987, appellants Dixie and Gary Cranford, husband and wife, were charged with the rape of two young girls. In March of 1987, they pled guilty pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement and were each sentenced to a term of eighteen years imprisonment on two counts of rape. The sentences were to be served concurrently. On October 19, 1987, appellants filed…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Coy v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. William Lloyd Hill v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  5. Isom v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sanford v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Johninson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. Mitchael v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  4. Kellogg v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
  5. Riddle v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API