Legal Opinion

Northern Pacific R. Co. v. Egeland

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 18, 1896No. 288PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

163 U.S. 93 (1896)

NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY

v.

EGELAND.

No. 288.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued and submitted April 20, 1896.

Decided May 18, 1896.

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

Mr. C.W. Bunn for plaintiff in error submitted on his brief.

Mr. Henry J. Gjertsen for defendant in error.

2Opinion of the Court · PeckhamJustice Peckham

This action was brought in the United States Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota, Fourth Division, by the plaintiff against the railroad company to recover damages which he alleged he had sustained by reason of the neglect of the agents and servants of the company.…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Northern Pacific Railroad v. EgelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Hunter v. Cooperstown & Susquehanna Valley RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1889

4Cited by20 opinions

  1. Coley v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  2. Toledo, St. L. & W. R. v. HoweCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
  3. Stephens v. Southern RailwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1902
  4. Chicago & E. R. v. PonnCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
  5. Harvey v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1909

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API