Legal Opinion

Spencer County Assessor and Grass Township Assessor v. AK Steel Corporation

Indiana Tax Court

Decided October 5, 2016No. 49T10-1306-TA-57PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FISHER, Senior Judge.

Indiana Code § 6-1.1-3-23 provides integrated steel mills with the option of using “Pool 5” to value their personal property for purposes of taxation. The statute defines an “integrated steel mill” as “a person ... that produces steel by processing iron ore and other raw materials in a blast furnace in Indiana[.]” See Ind.Code § 6—1.1—3—23(a)(3) (2008) (amended 2011). On appeal, the parties have asked the Court to examine whether the “in Indiana” language contained in that definition is constitutional. The Court finds that AK Steel has not shown a constitutional infirmity.

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Nordlinger v. HahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nancy A. Daw, Stephen L. Hoback, Co-Trustees of Sagacious Sentinel Sycamore Revocable Trust v. Hancock County AssessorIndiana Tax Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API