Harshman v. State

Bryan Harshman appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. He challenges both the finality of the judgment and the motion court's decision to deny his motion without an evidentiary hearing. Because the motion court failed to adjudicate all of the claims raised in the motion, the appeal is dismissed for lack of a final judgment.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In May 2014, Harshman pleaded guilty to possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute and keeping or maintaining a public nuisance. The court sentenced him to…