Federal Land Bank of Omaha v. Lower
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
LAVORATO, Justice.
The only issue properly presented for our further review here is whether a mortgagor must account to a mortgagee’s receiver for rent the mortgagor received on encumbered land during the period between the entry of a foreclosure decree and the request for appointment of a receiver.
John V. and Diana K. Lower, the mortgagors and defendants in this case, contend that a mortgage’s lien provisions take effect only after the mortgagee has both commenced foreclosure and requested the appointment of a receiver. The Federal Land Bank of Omaha, the mortgagee and plaintiff, argues that…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Whiteside v. MorrisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
- Kooistra v. GibfordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
- Equitable Life Insurance v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
- Farmers Trust & Savings Bank v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. LinnanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re WatersUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · 1988
- In Re KrantzUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · 1989
- Federal Land Bank v. Terpstra (In Re Porter)District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1988
- Moad v. NeillCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1989
- United States v. G & T Enterprises, L.C.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.