Legal Opinion

Federal Land Bank of Omaha v. Lower

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 16, 1988No. 86-1393PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAVORATO, Justice.

The only issue properly presented for our further review here is whether a mortgagor must account to a mortgagee’s receiver for rent the mortgagor received on encumbered land during the period between the entry of a foreclosure decree and the request for appointment of a receiver.

John V. and Diana K. Lower, the mortgagors and defendants in this case, contend that a mortgage’s lien provisions take effect only after the mortgagee has both commenced foreclosure and requested the appointment of a receiver. The Federal Land Bank of Omaha, the mortgagee and plaintiff, argues that…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Whiteside v. MorrisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  2. Kooistra v. GibfordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  3. Equitable Life Insurance v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
  4. Farmers Trust & Savings Bank v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  5. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. LinnanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re WatersUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · 1988
  2. In Re KrantzUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · 1989
  3. Federal Land Bank v. Terpstra (In Re Porter)District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1988
  4. Moad v. NeillCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1989
  5. United States v. G & T Enterprises, L.C.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API