Legal Opinion

Pitts v. Spokane Chronicle Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1964No. 36894PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.

Plaintiffs, claiming libel, brought this action against a daily newspaper. By answer, the newspaper admitted publishing the statements, but denied that the statements were in any way defamatory or that plaintiffs suffered any loss or damage from them. From a judgment for the plaintiffs in the sum of $2,000 after trial to the court, the defendant appeals.

On two separate occasions, the questions of law raised by the pleadings were considered in extenso by different judges. Judge Raymond F. Kelly ruled upon defendant’s motion for. summary judgment, and favored the record with his formal…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pavesich v. New England Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Sydney v. MacFadden Newspaper Publishing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Madison v. BoltonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
  4. Purvis v. Bremer's, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Ziebell v. Lumbermens Printing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Taskett v. King Broadcasting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Sims v. Kiro, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  3. Brown v. KittermanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  4. Getchell v. Auto Bar Systems Northwest, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Andreason v. Guard Publishing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API