Legal Opinion

Brackins v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 31, 1990No. 1648, September Term, 1989PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERT, Chief Judge.

The overriding question presented by this appeal is what is meant by the use of the word “exploitation” within the ambit of the child abuse statute, Md.Ann.Code art. 27, § 35A(a)(4)(i).

The facts of this case are simple. Robert Paul Brackins is married to the mother of the then twelve-year-old victim. On the date of the alleged offense, Brackins was at home with the child. The mother was at work. Mrs. Brackins testified that Mr. Brackins lived at the same residence as the victim, and that Mr. Brackins was responsible for the care of the victim while she worked. Mrs.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Pugh v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  4. Nightingale v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  5. Commonwealth v. LudwigSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Degren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. United States v. Hans Cabrera-UmanzorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  3. Rite Aid Corp. v. HagleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  4. Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  5. Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API