Legal Opinion

Metcalfe v. Bruning Division of AMI

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 9, 1993No. 92CA1599PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge NEY.

In this workers’ compensation case, Robert Metcalfe (claimant) petitions for review of a final order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Panel determining that his permanent total disability benefits were offset by funds he received from the settlement of his third-party lawsuit. We affirm.

The facts as found by the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), because they are based primarily on a stipulation, are undisputed. In 1986, while working for respondent Brun-ing Division of AMI (employer), claimant sustained an admitted industrial injury for which employer’s insurer, Liberty…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Travelers Insurance Co. v. SavioSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  2. Pomeroy v. WaitkusSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  3. Kirkham v. Hickerson Bros. Truck Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Kennedy v. Industrial Com'n of State of Colo.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Bayush v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Colorado Compensation Insurance Authority v. BakerColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Sneath v. Express Messenger ServiceColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Jordan v. Fonken & Stevens, P.C.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Andrews v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API