Legal Opinion
Disciplinary Proceedings Against Knickmeier
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided July 21, 2004No. 02-2438-DPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
¶ 1. Attorney Jeffrey D. Knick-meier (hereafter Knickmeier or respondent) has appealed from the referee's report including findings of fact and conclusions of law which was filed in this court on September 30, 2003. After a public hearing, the referee determined that of the 23 counts of misconduct alleged by the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) in its complaint filed against Knickmeier, the evidence established, or Knickmeier admitted, that he had committed 21 of those separate counts. Specifically, Knickmeier admitted the violations alleged in 8 of the counts, and the referee, the Honorable…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against CarrollWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- State Ex Rel. La Crosse Tribune v. Circuit Court for La Crosse CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Disciplinary Proceedings Against ReitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. John Kenyatta RileyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael M. KrillWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. WillihnganzWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Carl Robert ScholzWisconsin Supreme Court · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.