Barrett v. Moise
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Townsend, J., Sumter, March term, 1900. Action in partition by brittle Dora Barrett by Penlope V. Freeman, her guardian ad litem, against Marion Moise, Henry D. Barrett et al.
Read the full summary
Before Townsend, J., Sumter, March term, 1900. Action in partition by brittle Dora Barrett by Penlope V. Freeman, her guardian ad litem, against Marion Moise, Henry D. Barrett et al. From judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals. cites : As to service upon and obtaining jurisdiction of the minor: 17 S. C., 75; Code, 155, 159, 160; 17 S. C., 435; 23 S. C., 154, 187; 24 S. C., 373i 25 S. C., 275; 31 S. C., 576; 1 Black on Judgts., sec. 194; Code, 137. cite: Exceptions pointing out no specific error cannot be considered by the Court: 51 S. C., 306; 53 S. C., 24, 44, 155; 54 S. C., 364, 405.…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Chiee Justice McIver.
The plaintiff brought this action against the defendants for the partition of a certain tract of land described in the complaint, alleging that she was entitled to an undivided one-tenth interest in the said land, that the defendants are entitled to the remaining nine-tenths in the proportions set out in the complaint. The defendants answered, denying that the plaintiff has any interest whatsoever in the said land, and alleging, that they are the absolute owners in fee simple of the said land; and they go on to allege that they…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kennedy v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
3Cited by2 opinions
- Byrnes v. Butte Brewing Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1911
- Atwood v. HolmesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949