Legal Opinion

Owen v. Vanderslice

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 15, 1854PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from the District Court of the Parish of West Feliciana, Sterling,

1Opinion of the CourtBdciianan, J.

Defendant being sued upon his promissory note, pleaded two accounts for work and labor done in compensation and payment. The Court below properly rejected the evidence offered on the part of the defendant to prove that the work was done, and the prices charged were reasonable. C. C. 2205. The claim sued on was an unconditional promise to pay a sum of money certain. That set up in defence had neither been the subject of an agreement to pay a fixed price for the work, nor been liquidated by an acknowledgement of the correctness of the account after the completion of the work. The latter case…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Shreveport v. CurcioLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. Jones v. DavisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Bennett v. BordelonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API