State v. Eismann

Defendant appeals from conviction for criminal activity in drugs contending that the denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized from his person during police “pat down” was error. We affirm.

*94On February 11, 1974, a Portland police officer (Scarino) signed an affidavit in support of a warrant to search an envelope addressed to the defendant. The affidavit asserted that the affiant had been contacted by a postal inspector (Taylor) who told the affiant that a customs official at the Customs Airmail Facility at the Port of Los Angeles (Castro) had examined the contents of the envelope in…