Legal Opinion
State v. Vanderpool
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided June 10, 2008No. 26402-5-IIIPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
184 P.3d 1282 (2008)
State of WASHINGTON, Respondent,
v.
Timothy Allen VANDERPOOL, Appellant.
No. 26402-5-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3.
June 10, 2008.
Dennis W. Morgan, Attorney at Law, Ritzville, WA, for Appellant.
Julie Elizabeth Long, Alexander Bruce Johnson, Attorney at Law, Kennewick, WA, for Respondent.
SWEENEY, J.
¶ 1 This appeal follows the trial judge's refusal to suppress drug evidence seized from the defendant, Timothy Vanderpool. The court relied on RCW 46.20.349 (conferring the right to stop a car if the registered owner's license is suspended). And the parties here on…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. O'NeillWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. AcreyWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. AcreyWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Bock v. State Board of Pilotage CommissionersWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. CraneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State Of Washington v. Martha E. FroehlichCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- State Of Washington v. Martha E. FroehlichCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017