Legal Opinion

Woodinville Water Dist. v. King County

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 16, 2001No. 46113-3-IPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

21 P.3d 309 (2001)

105 Wash.App. 897

WOODINVILLE WATER DISTRICT, a municipal corporation, Appellant,

v.

KING COUNTY, a municipal corporation, and Barbara Kelson, Respondents.

No. 46113-3-I.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

April 16, 2001.

Rosemary Anne Larson, Michael Paul Ruark, Inslee Best Doezie & Ryder, P.S., Bellevue, for Appellant.

John Furse Briggs, King Co. Sr. Deputy Prosecuting Atty., Seattle, for Respondent, King County.

Barbara Kelson, Pro se.

KENNEDY, J.

A King County Hearing Examiner granted Woodinville Water District a conditional use permit to expand its nonconforming use of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Skagit Surveyors v. FRIENDS OF SKAGITWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Skagit Surveyors & Engineers, LLC v. Friends of Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. King County v. Washington State Boundary Review BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Norway Hill Preservation & Protection Ass'n v. King County CouncilWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Chaussee v. Snohomish County CouncilCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rosema v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  2. King County Department of Development & Environmental Services v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  3. King County v. DEPT. OF DEVELOPMENTCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API