Laidley v. Cummings
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 8á — PETITION OKDIN AUY — APPEAL PROM KENTON CIRCUIT COURT. 1. _An answer, pleading and relying upon a discharge in bankruptcy* . must show jurisdiction in the court granting the discharge.
Read the full summary
Case 8á — PETITION OKDIN AUY — APPEAL PROM KENTON CIRCUIT COURT. 1. _An answer, pleading and relying upon a discharge in bankruptcy* . must show jurisdiction in the court granting the discharge. (Gebhard v. Gamier, 12 Bush, 321; McBlmoyle v. Cohen, 13 Peters*. 312; Barron v. Mayor of Baltimore, 7 Peters, 243; "Twitchell v_ Commonwealth, 7 -Wallace, 321; Carpenter v. Snelling, 97 Mass.,. 452; Green v. Holway, 101 Mass., 49; People v. Gates, 43 N. Y., 40; Moore v. Quirk, 105 Mass., 49; Hunter v. Cobb, 1 Bush, 239;. Hills v. Mitson, 8 Exchequer, 750; Saokett v. Andross, 5 Hill,., 327; Stephens…
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE LEWIS
DELIVBRBI) THE OFIMTOH OF THE.COURT.
This is an action by appellants on a promissory note given January 26, 1875. In Ms answer to tlie petition appellee says that June 9, 1875, he filed- his *609petition in bankruptcy in the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri, and such proceedings were had in relation thereto in said court as resulted in him receiving a full, final and complete discharge from all debts and -claims which, by the act of Congress establishing ■ a uniform system of bankruptcy throughout the United States, approved March 2, 1867, and an…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gebhard v. GarnierCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1876
- Thurmond v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1874
3Cited by1 opinion
- Montgomery v. Consolidated Boat Store Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903