Legal Opinion
Harrigill v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided January 25, 1950No. A-10998PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrett, J.
Plaintiff in error, Harry H. Harrigill, defendant below, was charged by information in the district court of Tulsa county, Okla., with the crime of unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, Title 37, § 31, O. S. A. 1941, and by reason of being a third offender was alleged to be an habitual violator of the prohibitory laws of the State of Oklahoma. The defendant was tried and convicted by a jury and his punishment fixed at a year and a day in the penitentiary under the provi sions of section 14, Title 37, O. S. A. 1941, section 18, chapter 70, Session Laws of 1911, page 165, and judgment and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- City of Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Ex Parte SmithCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923
- Nowakowski v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
- Ex Parte OldenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1948
- Southport v. OgdenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1854
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Atchley v. Board of Barber Examiners of StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- State v. OlguinNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- Ex Parte BarnettCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1953
- Shiever v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1951
- McLean v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.