Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

The Florida Bar v. Abramson

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 8, 2009No. SC07-713Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLewis, J.

I agree with the recommendation of the referee and this Court’s approval of the finding of guilt for professional misconduct in this case. However, I dissent with regard to the rejection and disapproval of the discipline recommended in the thoughtful and well-reasoned report of the referee.

While I do not condone the behavior of the Respondent, the referee specifically found that both the judge and the Respondent became frustrated and that “both fueled the fire,” which produced this most unfortunate circumstance. The referee recommended a public reprimand, a period of probation, attendance at…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  2. In Re FrankSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  3. The Florida Bar v. MartocciSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  4. The Florida Bar v. GrahamSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  5. The Florida Bar v. BatmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API