Legal Opinion

Halder v. International Telephone & Telegraph Co.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided February 28, 1977No. 74-C-1532PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MISHLER, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff moves, pursuant to Rule 33(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for an order compelling defendant to answer interrogatories.

These interrogatories were first filed on January 27, 1975. A motion filed by plaintiff to compel answers was deferred by this court pending the resolution of defendant’s summary judgment motion, which ultimate*658ly was denied. On February 10, 1976, the defendant was orally directed to answer the interrogatories in accordance with our decision in Halder v. Sperry Rand, 74-C-1069 (E.D.N.Y. June 12, 1975). Answers to the interrogatories…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fischer & Porter Co. v. Sheffield Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1962
  2. DaSilva v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
  3. H. K. Porter Co.v. BremerDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1951

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Flanagan v. Travelers InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1986
  2. United States v. Jac Natori Co.United States Court of International Trade · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API