Legal Opinion

Stovall v. City of Jasper

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 28, 1928No. 6 Div. 50Published

1Opinion

We have indicated that the paving assessment, under section 223 of the Constitution and statutes, made against appellant's property, contained an illegal item that was separate and severable, and that may be eliminated without destroying the assessment.

The rehearing asks for a declaration by this court as to the right to interest by the municipality for the time preceding the elimination of the illegal item of cost included in the assessment against appellant's said lots.

The case of City of Birmingham v. Collins, 16 Ala. App. 222,77 So. 60, was upon the point. The effect of the decision by…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Perry v. WashburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Selleck v. FrenchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1814
  3. Gosnell v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
  4. Shaw v. PeckettSupreme Court of Vermont · 1854
  5. City of Galveston v. HeardTexas Supreme Court · 1881

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API