Legal Opinion · Dissent

Allen Etc. v. Van Buren Township Etc.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1962No. 30,194Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion

Landis, J.

— The sole question for decision in this case is whether the 2% debt limitation provided for in Article 13, §1 of the Constitution of Indiana1 is based *682upon the true cash value of the property or upon its assessed value, which is one-third of the cash value.

The question presented in this case is a matter of first impression in this state, and it is therefore appropriate for us to look to the decisions of courts of other states to ascertain how the matter has been considered in such jurisdictions.

An examination of such cases reveals that the same question here…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. N. W. Halsey & Co. v. City of Belle PlaineSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  2. City of Chicago v. FishburnIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Miller v. City of GlenwoodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  4. Hansen v. City of HoquiamWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Board of Education, Rich County School Dist. v. PasseyUtah Supreme Court · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API