Legal Opinion

Ordorica v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 14, 2001No. B141876PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ORTEGA, J.

During the initial 30-day period of medical control by the employer following an industrial injury, Daniel Ordorica refused care by the employer’s doctor and instead began treatment with a physician he chose. The Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) determined that Ordorica’s refusal and change of physicians was an illegal and deliberate attempt to deny the employer its right of medical control, and Ordorica was estopped from asserting his physician was the primary treating physician (PTP). In addition, the WCAB extended the employer’s medical control to two days after…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. LeVesque v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Garza v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Braewood Convalescent Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Arriaga v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. McCarty v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gaytan v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  2. Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API