Ordorica v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ORTEGA, J.
During the initial 30-day period of medical control by the employer following an industrial injury, Daniel Ordorica refused care by the employer’s doctor and instead began treatment with a physician he chose. The Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) determined that Ordorica’s refusal and change of physicians was an illegal and deliberate attempt to deny the employer its right of medical control, and Ordorica was estopped from asserting his physician was the primary treating physician (PTP). In addition, the WCAB extended the employer’s medical control to two days after…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- LeVesque v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Garza v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Braewood Convalescent Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Arriaga v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- McCarty v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gaytan v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011