Holmes v. McDowell
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from an order made at a Special Term denying a motion to require the receiver, appointed in the above actions,'to pay to the plaintiffs in actions Nos. 2, 3 and 4, the amounts of their respective judgments.
1Opinion of the Court
Westbrook, J.:
The first of the above entitled actions was one to wind up a copartnership, of which Henry C. Holmes and James H. McDowell had been the sole members. The object of the action was to adjust the affairs of the partnership, which was insolvent, and to divide the property equally among its creditors. The suit was commenced March, 20, 187.8, and on the twenty-sixth day of the same month by stipulation between the attorneys, an order of this court was made making Henry C. Holmes the receiver of the partnership property without security and without compensation. On the 2d day of May,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Noe v. GibsonNew York Court of Chancery · 1839
- Adams v. HackettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- O'Mahoney v. . BelmontNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Myrick v. SeldenNew York Supreme Court · 1861
- Waring v. RobinsonNew York Court of Chancery · 1840