Legal Opinion

Sanders v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 23, 2009No. 49A02-0901-CR-31PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHARPNACK, Senior Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Defendant-Appellant Antoine Sanders appeals dual convictions of resisting arrest, Class D felonies. We affirm.

ISSUES

Two issues have been raised for our consideration, which we restate as:

I. Whether Sanders waived the issue because he failed to file a motion to dismiss below.

Whether Sanders' two convictions for resisting law enforcement are barred by the continuing erime doctrine.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On April 6, 2008, Sanders attacked his girlfriend and took her 1997 Pontiac Bonneville. The Bonneville was subsequently reported as…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Boyd v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Daugherty v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Vaillancourt v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Armstead v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Johnson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brian E. Graves v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Jeffrey v. McCloud v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Lauren Cupp v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2025
  4. Matthew J. Bulliner v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Sanders v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API