Legal Opinion
State v. Baiduc, 2006-G-2711 (9-21-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided September 21, 2007No. 2006-G-2711PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Appellant, Theodore Baiduc III, appeals his conviction for one count of driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs. At issue is whether his guilty plea was voluntary and whether he received effective assistance of counsel. For the reasons that follow, his conviction is affirmed.
{¶ 2} On July 21, 2005, appellant was charged in a two-count indictment with one count of operating a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol or drugs ("OMVI") having previously been convicted of or pleaded guilty to five or more violations of OMVI within the last twenty years, in violation of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Nichols v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- State v. KapperOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. BaiducOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. IckesOhio Court of Appeals · 2026
- State v. WilderOhio Court of Appeals · 2013