Legal Opinion

Oien v. Oien

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 2005No. 20050204PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Andrea (Oien) Huso through the South Central Child Support Enforcement Unit (“Unit”) appealed from a district court order denying a motion to modify judgment to increase child support payments. We conclude the district court misapplied the law in denying Huso’s request for a hearing on her motion to modify judgment. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

I

[¶ 2] Reed Oien, Huso’s former husband, was required to pay $656.00 a month for the support of his three minor children following the couple’s divorce. Oien was later diagnosed with congestive heart failure and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. SchmidtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Matter of Estate of RakettiNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Van Dyke v. Van DykeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Nelson v. NelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. McDowell v. McDowellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Bertsch v. BertschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State Ex Rel. K.B. v. BauerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Clark v. ClarkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Schurmann v. SchurmannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Horob v. Farm Credit Services of North Dakota ACANorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API