Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Trout

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 12, 1913PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Action for damages. Before Judge Fite. Gordon superior court. December 9, 1912.

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, P. J.

The plaintiff obtained a verdict for injuries alleged to have been negligently inflicted by the railroad company in the running of its ears over a public-road crossing. The court refused a new trial, and the defendant brings error.

' 1. Exception is taken to this excerpt from the court’s instruction to the jury: “In this connection I charge you that if a wit*122ness swear to an improbable story, that in itself would not' be sufficient to impeach him, but slight circumstances in conflict therewith might or might not be sufficient to authorize a jury to disbelieve his testimony, as the jury might…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. TroutSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Trammell v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  2. Lewis v. PattersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  3. Furney v. TowerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  4. Bart v. ScheiderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  5. Barrett v. City of BrunswickCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API