Legal Opinion

Eystra v. Capelle

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 15, 1876PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error to Si. Louis Circuit Court. cited Jackson vs. Stephens, 16 Johns., 110; 2 Sin. Lead. Cas., 751, and note; 38 Mo., 555 ; Babcock vs. Booth,.2Hill., 181 ; Maguire vs. Maury, 1 B. Mon., 221;■ 2 Kent. Com., 168-179 ; 7 Barb. 388 ; 1 Greenl. Ev., 33 ; He run. Estop., 269, § 248.

1Opinion of the CourtWagner, Judge

Plaintiff’s action is founded on an alleged indebtedness to her by the defendant, growing out of the sale and convey*579anee of certain lands lying in the State of Illinois. It is claimed that she and her husband, now deceased, executed the deed for the consideration of three thousand dollars, which was to be paid to them, and for which this suit is brought, and that the land was her sole and separate property. Defendant admits that the consideration named in' the deed was three thousand dollars, but says that its receipt by the grantors was acknowledged therein, and for a further defense says,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McLaren v. HallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  2. Worley v. DrydenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Long v. MartinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  2. Macfarland v. HeimSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  3. Kuenzel v. StevensSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  4. Rodgers v. Bank of Pike CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
  5. Garnett v. BerryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1876

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API