Legal Opinion

Hazek v. Mercadante

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 8, 1952PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

22 N.J. Super. 103 (1952)

91 A.2d 666

ANITA HAZEK, HILDA KRESS AND CATHERINE MONCK, PLAINTIFFS,

v.

JOSEPH MERCADANTE, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Decided October 8, 1952.

Mr. Daniel F. DeLear, for the motion.

Mr. George Pellettieri argued against the motion (Mr. George H. Anthony, attorney).

WOODS, J.S.C.

There is before us a motion to dismiss the complaint filed in the above-entitled cause, on the ground: that plaintiffs failed to comply with Rule 3:41-2 in that they failed to cause the summons to issue within five days after filing the complaint with the Clerk of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pagano v. Krispy Kernals, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Byrd v. Ontario Freight Lines Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  2. Ioannou v. Ivy Hill Pk. Section Four, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API