Legal Opinion · Dissent

Diamond Offshore Services Limited and Diamond Offshore Services Company v. Willie David Williams

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 23, 2015No. 01-13-01068-CVPublished

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION

Evelyn V. Keyes,

Justice, dissenting.

I respectfully dissent, and I urge the Texas Supreme Court to take this case to *81establish the criteria for exclusion of a surveillance video in the Texas courts under Texas Rules of Evidence 403, which governs the admissibility of evidence whose probative value is allegedly substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice or needless cumulativeness.

In this case, the trial court refused to admit into evidence a surveillance video showing the plaintiff, Willie David Williams, performing multiple physical tasks while at the same…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. City of Brownsville v. AlvaradoTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Texas Department of Transportation v. AbleTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Bay Area Healthcare Group, Ltd. v. McShaneTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Brookshire Brothers, Ltd. v. Jerry AldridgeTexas Supreme Court · 2014

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API