Legal Opinion

Hamel v. Toronto Inv. Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 21, 1950No. 33400PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, V. C. J.

This is a suit in equity to enforce specific performance of an option to purchase agreement contained in a 99-year lease executed by the defendants and plaintiffs on the 12th day of August, 1936, covering part of lot 7 in block 88, in the city of Tulsa as shown by the original plat thereof.

The facts and circumstances out of which this litigation arose had their beginning in 1928, at which time the Quaker Investment Company, a corporation owned by A. J. Hamel, C. L. Waite, and Fannie C. Waite, held title to the real estate here involved in undivided interests, A. J. Hamel…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Andrews v. EnglishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Watkins v. MusselmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  2. Emerson v. YoungsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  3. Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  4. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  5. Sexton v. MorganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API