Legal Opinion

State v. Weist

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 21, 1986No. 84112247; CA A36464PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarden, J.

After a trial on stipulated facts, defendant was convicted of unauthorized use of a vehicle, ORS 164.135, and theft in the first degree. ORS 164.055. Defendant argues that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence. We affirm.

Defendant had been the subject of an ongoing Eugene Police Department investigation of an auto salvage switch operation, which involved the reregistration of stolen vehicles using vehicle identification numbers (VIN) and title documents of similar vehicles purchased at auto salvage yards. During the investigation, the police noticed that a pickup…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. DeKuyperCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. Shelton v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. WeistCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  2. State v. WeistOregon Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API